March 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Mar 1 10:50:33 EDT 2007
Ending: Sat Mar 24 12:12:40 EDT 2007
Messages: 31

• [Kodachrome] My K664 shipment came today - emulsion and date   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared tobe sharper than digital images   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared tobe sharper than digital images   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to besharper than digital images   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to besharper than digital images   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to besharper than digital images   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Poor quality K64 processing...or bad film?   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Bad K64...   Phil Burton
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Stefan Daystrom
• [Kodachrome] Poor quality K64 processing...or bad film?   Ted Ellis
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Bill Gillooly
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Bill Gillooly
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared tobesharper than digital images   Bill Gillooly
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show allappearedtobesharper than digital images   Michael Kersenbrock
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Robert King
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Otto Mellar
• [Kodachrome] Poor quality K64 processing...or bad film?   Otto Mellar
• [Kodachrome] Re: Kodachrome 200 availability   Dr. Kevin Pernicano
• [Kodachrome] Re: Provia   Dr. Kevin Pernicano
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared to be sharper than digital images   Steven Sawyer
• [Kodachrome] K64 - a replacement for K200   Steven Sawyer
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared tobesharper than digital images   Ron Schwarz
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show allappearedtobesharper than digital images   Ron Schwarz
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appearedtobesharper than digital images   Ron Schwarz
• [Kodachrome] Bad K64...   Ted
• [Kodachrome] Projected slides at recent show all appeared tobe sharper than digital images   John Weiler
• [Kodachrome] Please sell me your Kodachrome 25   John Weiler
• [Suspect] Re: [Kodachrome] K64 - a replacement for K200   tandemcat at juno.com
• [Kodachrome] Poor quality K64 processing...or bad film?   tandemcat at juno.com
• [Kodachrome] Please sell me your Kodachrome 25   tandemcat at juno.com

Last message date: Sat Mar 24 12:12:40 EDT 2007
Archived on: Sat Mar 24 12:12:45 EDT 2007

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...